misrepresentation case law Can Be Fun For Anyone
misrepresentation case law Can Be Fun For Anyone
Blog Article
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative of the regulation laid down from the Supreme Court in the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. So, the competent authority on the parent department on the petitioner and also the Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount of your petitioner and pay the pension amount and other ancillary benefits to your petitioner to which He's entitled under the legislation within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority in the respondent is also directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits in the petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more
This Court may possibly interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside a fashion inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding achieved through the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If the conclusion or finding is including no reasonable person would have ever arrived at, the Court may well interfere with the conclusion or even the finding and mildew the relief to make it acceptable towards the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority will be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-appreciate the evidence or even the nature of punishment. Over the aforesaid proposition, we're fortified via the decision in the Supreme Court while in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
criminal revision application is dismissed. reduced into the period of his detention in jail he has already undergone(Criminal Revision )
The recent amendment to Section 489-File with the Pakistan Penal Code signifies a progressive step towards effectively combatting counterfeiting activities. Through its expanded scope, heightened penalties, and technological considerations, the amendment aligns the legislation with contemporary challenges.
Retribution: Section 302 PPC also serves the purpose of retribution, where society seeks justice to the loss of a life. It allows the legal system to impose a proportional punishment within the offender, making certain they are held accountable for their actions.
already been released from the jail completion of his term . Appeal dismissed on merits (Murder Trial)
The Court directed the Chief Secretary of Sindh to ensure the Act's effective implementation in line with its original purpose and called for educational programs Bachelor degree(s) in the subject of cooperative societies. Read more
Therefore, this petition is found to generally be not maintainable and is dismissed along with the pending application(s), and the petitioners might look for remedies through the civil court process as discussed read more supra. Read more
If the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may well dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't had an opportunity to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC could allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is usually only performed In case the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. Within the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence along with the petitioner company responded into the allegations therefore they were nicely aware of the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use for being looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
This article delves into the intricacies of your recent amendment, accompanied by relevant case law, to provide an extensive understanding of its implications and sensible applications.
A coalition of residents sent a letter of petition into the Supreme Court to challenge the Water and Power Enhancement Authority’s (WAPDA) construction of the electricity grid station in their community, on designated “green belt” property. The Court read the matter being a human rights case, as Article 184 (3) from the Pakistan Constitution gives unique jurisdiction to your Supreme Court to acquire up and determine any matter concerning the enforcement of fundamental rights of public importance.
The decision further directed the government of Pakistan to ascertain a commission of internationally known and recognized scientists to review and rule on potential grid station projects. In addition, the Court ordered WAPDA to immediately introduce public consultation and objection procedures for all projects concerning grid stations and power lines.